Home > Management > Being respective of your time, as well as others

Being respective of your time, as well as others

One of the biggest challenges I’ve run into in being a “remotee” is the daily interaction with other team members. When you are just a cube, an office, or a desk away, there’s always that common water cooler or coffee pot that provides a natural place to interact with others. Or, if you have a question, you can always just stop and ask. Being able to physically get together without having to make much effort is a real bonus for people working in the same office, but can be a bit more challenging if you are remote team member. But this can also be a blessing in disguise, allowing you to concentrate on projects more and be interrupted less often.

What many people don’t realize is that every interaction with fellow team member or collegue is a meeting, and having that meeting is taking he or she away from thier normal duties. Organizations don’t hire people to be in meetings all day, they hire them to be productive contributors to making the organzation as a whole successful. This is where being remote has it’s advantage, as it’s easier to turn off the outside world by turning off your virtual links where in an office you have to hide somewhere to when you need some heads down time.

I recently read the book “Read This Before Our Next Meeting“, which talks about how to improve the quality of the meetings you hold, and at the same time eliminate those pointless meetings that drag your team down. The big takeaway I had from the book is that you need to be respectful of other people’s time. How do you best do this in the context of meetings? Here’s some good starting points:

  • Every meeting should have an agenda, a purpose, and a goal. This helps avoid those “open discussion” types of meetings which can quickly diverge away from what you are really meeting about. A meeting should have a clear purpose that is communicated to the attendees an agenda that everyone has before the meeting so they are ready to discuss the talking points to be addressed. And in end, there should be some tangible goal to be achieved by having a meeting, whether this is a decision to make or action items for people to take out of the meeting to work on separately.
  • Keep meetings short and to the point. Avoid blocking out an hour of someone’s time for a meeting when 15 or 30 minutes will do. This also helps keep you on topic and focused, forcing you to avoid the conversation from spinning out of control.
  • Invite only who should be there. Sometimes we like to play the politics game and make sure certain people are at a meeting. Other times we are worried about “making descions behind closed doors” and thus overinvite to make sure nobody feel out of the loop. If someone really just wants to know what happened, but not really needing to contribute, then take notes or record the session so they can review later. Then if they feedback they can follow up outside of the meeting. The goal here is to have less people in a meeting, which reduces the chances of a meeting spinning wildly out of control.
  • Use smaller meetings for planning, and larger meetings for approval. A friend of mine once told me that the best meeting is one where the decision has already been made, you are just getting everyone’s OK on that decision. I completely agree with this; smaller meetings are great to brainstorm since you can easily have a discussion, but with each person you add keeping everyone on topic gets harder and harder. It’s best to bring a plan to a meeting to have it approved or rejected, then outside of the meeting deal with all the details.

What are your pointers for effective meetings and finding ways to be respectful of people’s time? Let me know in comments.

About these ads
Categories: Management
  1. November 30, 2011 at 6:25 am | #1

    … or perhaps use IRC/Group collaboration tools to have a constant; slow collaborative meeting without interrupting people’s flow.

    • November 30, 2011 at 10:41 am | #2

      That’s a good idea, and one that self transcribes which is a plus for building meeting notes after the fact. It can be difficult for bigger meetings unless you have a moderator managing the incoming messages, but if it’s a well managed and planned out meeting it can be very effective.

  2. December 2, 2011 at 4:15 am | #3

    Remote or not, meetings that don’t have an agenda (or have one and fail to stick to it), start late, run over, or generally trample on the time people have to do actual work are a real pain. You burn a LOT of resource when you have multiple sitting in a room not doing whatever they were employed to do. Now I’m independent, I only have meetings for a reason, and a lot of the time I’m billing hourly for those … I find they tend not to run over as often :)

    • December 2, 2011 at 3:07 pm | #4

      +1 Lorna, I think sometimes people don’t realize how time destructive a poorly planned or ran meeting can be, especially when it takes a lot of effort to coordinate schedules.

      Maybe we should all try to bill our employers for meeting time ;-)

  1. February 23, 2012 at 9:31 pm | #1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 714 other followers

%d bloggers like this: